Skip to content
JW
CompetitionCV award2025

MCM 2025 — Better Traffic, Better City

2025美赛D题论文

A transport-network resilience study of the Baltimore bridge collapse using directed graphs, random walks, Monte Carlo simulation and reconstruction scenarios.

MCM 2025 — Better Traffic, Better City project diagram

25p

MCM paper

10k

random-walk simulations

2.1%

post-collapse disturbance impact

01 / Overview

What this package actually contains.

The 2025 MCM paper studies how the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse changes Baltimore’s transport-network connectivity and stability. It models the city as a directed graph and compares the collapsed, reconstructed and random-disturbance scenarios.

Objectives

  • 01Represent Baltimore’s transport network as a directed graph.
  • 02Quantify connectivity before and after the bridge collapse.
  • 03Test network stability under random disturbances and reconstruction scenarios.

Competition narrative

Problem, model, result, paper.

The page foregrounds the modelling decision and result before implementation details.

Stage 01

City graph

Nodes and directed routes with bridge-dependent links.

01

Stage 02

Random walk

Repeated movement simulation over the graph.

02

Stage 03

Connectivity metric

Expected reachable connectivity across simulations.

03

Stage 04

Disturbance tests

Random edge failures and response comparison.

04

Stage 05

Policy scenarios

Post-collapse versus post-reconstruction comparison.

05

02 / Package highlights

What this work demonstrates.

  • Measures network connectivity before and after disruption with 10,000 simulations.
  • Compares post-collapse and post-reconstruction stability under random disturbances.
  • Turns a public-infrastructure event into a quantitative resilience model.

03 / Model

The modelling choices behind the result.

01

Connectivity as an expected value

The paper reports an expected connectivity of 207.79 after the collapse and 208.22 after reconstruction. The difference is small in absolute terms but indicates the bridge’s structural role in the network.

02

Stability under disturbance

Random disturbances reduce expected connectivity by about 2.1% in the collapsed state and only about 0.99% after reconstruction. This separates the immediate connectivity level from the network’s resilience to further shocks.

04 / Key code

Selected modelling code.

Only verified source excerpts and pseudocode taken from the project papers are shown.

Paper pseudocodePseudocode

Random-walk connectivity pseudo-code

Algorithm outline stated in the MCM paper; this is not claimed as original executable source.

PROCEDURE RANDOM_WALK_CONNECTIVITY(G, start, steps)
    visited <- {start}
    node <- start
    REPEAT steps TIMES
        neighbours <- OUTGOING_NEIGHBOURS(G, node)
        IF neighbours IS EMPTY THEN BREAK
        node <- RANDOM_CHOICE(neighbours)
        visited <- visited UNION {node}
    RETURN |visited| / |V(G)|
END PROCEDURE

PROCEDURE EXPECTED_CONNECTIVITY(G, runs)
    total <- 0
    REPEAT runs TIMES
        start <- RANDOM_CHOICE(V(G))
        total <- total + RANDOM_WALK_CONNECTIVITY(G, start, 500)
    RETURN total / runs
END PROCEDURE
Paper pseudocodePseudocode

Scenario comparison pseudo-code

Paper-level Monte Carlo outline for collapsed and reconstructed network states.

FOR EACH scenario IN {post_collapse, post_reconstruction}
    baseline <- EXPECTED_CONNECTIVITY(scenario.graph, 10000)
    disturbances <- EMPTY LIST

    REPEAT 100 TIMES
        G' <- COPY(scenario.graph)
        REMOVE_RANDOM_EDGES(G', fraction = 5%)
        disturbances.APPEND(EXPECTED_CONNECTIVITY(G', 10000))

    disturbed_mean <- MEAN(disturbances)
    change_pct <- (disturbed_mean - baseline) / baseline * 100
END FOR

Reproducibility notes

  • The model separates network topology from traffic volume.
  • Monte Carlo simulation expresses uncertainty as a distribution rather than one path.
  • Reconstruction and disturbance scenarios are evaluated with the same metric.

Limitations / next steps

  • The graph abstraction omits capacity, congestion and travel-time constraints.
  • Policy conclusions should be validated with real traffic counts and route-choice behaviour.

05 / Downloads

Files in this folder.

Open the original report, presentation or source archive. PDF cover pages with private details were removed.

PDF

MCM 2025 paper

EN · 25 pages · 4.0 MB

25-page competition paper on traffic-network resilience.

Open file